|
|
 |
Re: FN-FORUM Flash bg colour problem
date posted 15th November 2001 22:27
--=====================_100157478==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Ta Kif - very interesting.
I use 16 vs 24 bit and 800x600 vs 1024x768 as my test box but I'd assumed
that the larger screen sizes were taking over and I had no idea about
colour depth. I suppose the Windows default is likely to remain at High
Colour and 800x600 for some time...
I once had a client complain that the draft for a site looked terrible. I
found out they were using a 640x480 screen in 256 colours. And this was
only last year...
At 19:31 15/11/01 +0000, you wrote:
> >> i'd say 32 bit was more common for most people but i dont know the
> exact stats? it would be interesting to find out??
>
>This makes some assumptions about the users of my site being 'average' but
>these figures are similarly reflected elsewhere too....
>
>res
>640x480 0.69%
>800x600 58.78%
>1024x768 30.58%
>1280x1024 5.46%
>1152x864 2.78%
>1600x1200 0.69%
>Other 0.99%
>
>color
>8 Bit 1.48%
>16 Bit 69.21%
>24 Bit 7.74%
>32 Bit 21.35%
>Other 0.19%
>
>Kif
>
>Netrickery Design & Development (Ltd.)
>www.netrickery.com
>
>Weaving website magic since 1996
>email [EMAIL REMOVED]@netrickery.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: [EMAIL REMOVED]
>To: [EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net
>Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:34 PM
>Subject: Re: FN-FORUM Flash bg colour problem
>
>i disagree
>i'd say 32 bit was more common for most people but i dont know the exact
>stats?
>it would be interesting to find out??
>----- Original Message -----
>From: [EMAIL REMOVED] J White
>To: [EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net
>Sent: 15 November 2001 18:15
>Subject: Re: FN-FORUM Flash bg colour problem
>
> > But what if your users are using 16bit colour? My computer works faster
> > with fewer colours and the difference between 16 and 24bit graphics on the
> > screen is minimal normally.
> >
> > Dave
>
>Most people do use 16 bit (AKA 65K Colors or High Color) 47.5% seems a fair
>average of stats I've seen, so it is worth trying to get it right. I also
>find that using 32bit slows the computer a little, even with half a gig of
>RAM, so I stick with 16 bit.........
>
>Paul.
>
>
>
>===========================================================
>
>TightBriefs.com is now live!!!
>
>Clients post their tightly defined briefs, choose a price
>and freelancers are invited to apply.
>
>All client to freelancer contact is handled by us.
>
>Go To: http://www.tightbriefs.com for more
>details.
>
>============================================================
>
>* Free listing for freelancers
>* Free to advertise jobs
>* Free jobs distribution service
>* Free database of 1000 freelancers
>
>Freelancers and Freelance Jobs
>http://www.freelancers.net
>
>To post to the Forum:
[EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net
>
>To unsubscribe please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net?body=unsubscribe%20freelancers
>
>To unsubscribe from the digest please email:
>
[EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net?body=unsubscribe%20freelancers-digest
>
>If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
[EMAIL REMOVED]@freelancers.net
>
>To subscribe to the digest for this list or for further information please
>visit:
>http://www.freelancers.net/forum.html
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system
>(http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.295 / Virus Database: 159 - Release Date: 01/11/2001
--=====================_100157478==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Ta Kif - very interesting.
I use 16 vs 24 bit and 800x600 vs 1024x768 as my test box but I'd assumed
that the larger screen sizes were taking over and I had no idea about
colour depth. I suppose the Windows default is likely to remain at High
Colour and 800x600 for some time...
I once had a client complain that the draft for a site looked terrible. I
found out they were using a 640x480 screen in 256 colours. And this was
only last year...
At 19:31 15/11/01 +0000, you wrote:
>>
i'd say 32 bit was more common for most people but i dont know the exact
stats? it would be interesting to find out??
This makes some assumptions about the users of
my site being 'average' but these figures are similarly reflected
elsewhere too....
res
640x480
0.69%
800x600
58.78%
1024x768
30.58%
1280x1024
5.46%
1152x864
2.78%
1600x1200
0.69%
Other
0.99%
color
8
Bit
1.48%
16
Bit
69.21%
24
Bit
7.74%
32
Bit
21.35%
Other
0.19%
Kif
Netrickery Design & Development (Ltd.)
www.netrickery.com
Weaving website magic since 1996
email
|
|
|
