Re: FN-FORUM 2 Urgent Requirements

date posted 22nd January 2002 15:20

On Tuesday 22 Jan 2002 1:20 pm, IDCreative wrote:
> * * *
>
> >It was BECAUSE no-one had the chance to know who you were that the
>
> assumption
>
> >was harsh.
>
> God help you in a court of law.

???

>
> * * *
>
> >If you are happy to tout for work with someone who is hiding their
> > identity and won't tell you who they are until you get the job, then fair
> > enough.
>
> Many
>
> >other businesses wouldn't dream of working that way.
>
> Is it really all that important though? Let's face it, *who* they are isn't
> important at all as long as they pay their bills. Most large corporates
> never tell there employees who their client is at all - even when the
> employee is working on the project.

I haven't worked with any companies myself that did something that strange,
but I guess there will be some.


>
> >Circular self-defeating argument - you can't sign an NDA with an entity
>
> that
>
> >is keeping itself secret!
> >I think you mean rather more sensitive information than the client name
> > and address there...
>
> Yes, that is why I said 'Company Information'. I have never hidden my
> company name.

No, you quoted your trading name. Someone else had to point out your company
name.