|
|
 |
Re: FN-FORUM Re: [ OT ] physics question...
date posted 10th January 2003 11:40
There's not much to choose between them. However rumour has it that EDS had
a positive part in getting IR35 implemented...
Computacenter has a bad habit of cancelling requirements at the last minute.
Depends on the contract.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Kathy
http://www.vendetta.co.uk
DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark C" [EMAIL REMOVED]
To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: FN-FORUM Re: [ OT ] physics question...
> Who is the worse of the 2
> EDS or Computacenter (saying a very bitter contractor who was told earlier
> that "we wont be having you back after all")
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lists" [EMAIL REMOVED]
> To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: FN-FORUM Re: [ OT ] physics question...
>
>
> > Who are all contractors on lousy "caught by IR35" contracts on a low
> hourly
> > rate (or FTVs), while EDS rakes in the mark-up.
> >
> > Excellent place though. I went there in about 1997/8 and they had ATM to
> the
> > desktop even then.
> >
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Kathy
> > http://www.vendetta.co.uk
> > DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Darran Shepherd" [EMAIL REMOVED]
> > To: [EMAIL REMOVED]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:41 AM
> > Subject: RE: FN-FORUM Re: [ OT ] physics question...
> >
> >
> > > > Does anyone else find it amusing that the majority of Boeing
> > > > 747's run on P&W engines, but airforce 1 & 2 run Rolls Royce.
> > > > I suppose it says we are still doing something right as a country.
> > >
> > > It is amusing, but whether we're doing it right or not is another
> > > question. As far as I remember, Rolls Royce laid off a lot of their
> > > aero engines staff last year.
> > >
> > > I'm sure it's nothing to do with the fact that their Derby HQ is
> > > crawling with EDS consultants. Oh no. They're all there for free for
> > > the love of the job. ;)
> > >
> > > Darran.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ========
> > > Advertise with Freelancers.net +Additions+
> > > http://www.freelancers.net/advert.php
> > >
> > >
> > > Freelancers and Freelance Jobs:
> > > http://www.freelancers.net
> > >
> > > Forum FAQs:
> > > http://freelancers.netrickery.com
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe please email:
> > > [EMAIL REMOVED]
> > >
> > > If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
> > > [EMAIL REMOVED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ========
> > Advertise with Freelancers.net +Additions+
> > http://www.freelancers.net/advert.php
> >
> >
> > Freelancers and Freelance Jobs:
> > http://www.freelancers.net
> >
> > Forum FAQs:
> > http://freelancers.netrickery.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe please email:
> > [EMAIL REMOVED]
> >
> > If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
> > [EMAIL REMOVED]
>
>
> ========
> Advertise with Freelancers.net +Additions+
> http://www.freelancers.net/advert.php
>
>
> Freelancers and Freelance Jobs:
> http://www.freelancers.net
>
> Forum FAQs:
> http://freelancers.netrickery.com
>
> To unsubscribe please email:
> [EMAIL REMOVED]
>
> If you have difficulties unsubscribing please email:
> [EMAIL REMOVED]
>
|
 |
|