Re: FN-FORUM: OT friendly fire

date posted 25th March 2003 22:35

Clint Eastwoods head on Arnie's body

tharg

On 25/3/2003 2:42 pm, "Andrew Yorkshades" [EMAIL REMOVED]
wrote:

> As long as they can make the lawmaster go 'round corners... I wouldn't like
> to try it on tyres that wide...
>
> So who actually read 2000AD and who just watched the movie? And who thinks
> that Rogue Trooper would have made a much better film ("Universal Soldier"
> and "Soldier" notwithstanding)?
>
> And who would have made a better Dredd than Stallone?
>
> A.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Beckett [EMAIL REMOVED]
> Sent: 25 March 2003 14:33
> To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
> Subject: RE: FN-FORUM: OT friendly fire
>
>
> Now there was a gun!
> 6 different bullet types, voice activated, can only be fired by the Judge
> who owns it (or his clone!), armour piercing, heat seeking...
>
> Now all they need do is invent it and the Lawmaster. I'd love to get my
> hands on one of the movie versions :D
>
> This forum has descended into total geekdom today hasn't it! Maybe it's a
> reaction to all this sunshine...
>
> Michael Beckett
> Denial Design
> http://www.denialdesign.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf
> Of Merv
> Sent: 25 March 2003 03:38
> To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
> Subject: Re: FN-FORUM: OT friendly fire
>
>
> Judge Dredd's Lawgiver? But even then I bet they couldn't shoot straight.
>
> syn
>
> On 25/3/2003 12:22 am, "Derek Clarke" [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:
>
>> The police would love a gun that could only kill criminals.
>>
>> In article [EMAIL REMOVED]
>> [EMAIL REMOVED] (Martyn Feather) wrote:
>>
>>> Missed the point slightly - I wasn't referring to weapons, planes and
>
>>> vehicles - modern weaponry cannot distinguish between friendly and
>>> enemy forces (personnel)
>>
>> ==========
>>
> ==========
>
> ==========
>
> ==========
>