Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM: NEW CORPORATE TELEPHONE PREFERENCE SERVICE (CTPS)

date posted 22nd July 2004 12:53



Erm - I'm not sure that everyone is complaining about legislation to =
stop
it, it's more a case of questioning the 'blanket' method that's being
employed. I personally dislike making cold calls, but I do it =
occasionally.
A prime example is a new 'boutique' style hotel that's recently opened =
hear
me - they're not advertising a web site and it's quite possible it's one =
of
those 'things' on their 'to do' list. If I make a quick phone call to =
them
and ask if they'd be interested in receiving some information about our
services they can either say Yes or No. If I were to simply send some
unsolicited information in the post there's a good possibility it won't
reach the right person or end up unread in the bin. I'm not sure =
whether
the guidelines laid out make it clear whether it will be permissible to =
call
a company to establish who deals with a particular aspect of their =
business
in order to send them information by mail.



The sort of rates they're charging seem to me to be disproportionate to =
the
cost of running what is surely no more than a basic database of =
telephone
numbers and related company names. I'd have no objection to a service =
of
this nature being effectively self-funding with revenue set to cover
business overheads. At its minimum cost basis it means every single
business in the country that may wish to make the occasional phone call =
to a
potential customer will have to pay =A3375.00 per annum for the =
privilege.
Perhaps stealth tax is not the most appropriate wording to have used as =
I'm
not sure quite where revenue will end up - whichever way you look at it =
it's
still yet another bit of inappropriate red tape. =20



Precisely!!



No - not bitter and twisted - just someone with their eyes open!!



Sure - all of us get fed up with these banal calls made by someone =
reading
from an idiot card but, as is too often the case with such initiatives, =
it's
too general in its guidelines and allows for no distinction between
blanket/random telemarketing activity and minimal targeted business
solicitation.

Taking it one step further - what about sales reps for companies that =
wish
to call someone to make an appointment to discuss their business
requirements. They can't. The whole approach of this is going to =
stifle
business growth and it stinks.





Messages by Day
July 31st 2004
July 30th 2004
July 29th 2004
July 28th 2004
July 27th 2004
July 26th 2004
July 25th 2004
July 24th 2004
July 23rd 2004
July 22nd 2004
July 21st 2004
July 20th 2004
July 19th 2004
July 18th 2004
July 17th 2004
July 16th 2004
July 15th 2004
July 14th 2004
July 13th 2004
July 12th 2004
July 11th 2004
July 10th 2004
July 9th 2004
July 8th 2004
July 7th 2004
July 6th 2004
July 5th 2004
July 4th 2004
July 3rd 2004
July 2nd 2004
July 1st 2004


Messages by Month
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000