|
|
 |
RE: FN-FORUM: W3C compliancy
date posted 1st August 2004 13:32
Thanks guys. I will clarify a few points with the client.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL REMOVED] [EMAIL REMOVED] On Behalf Of Tony
Crockford
Sent: 01 August 2004 14:06
To: FN-FORUM / [EMAIL REMOVED]
Subject: Re: FN-FORUM: W3C compliancy
At 13:42 on Sunday, 01 Aug 2004, Alan O'Rourke wrote:
>
> How much of a world of pain is it to get W3C compliancy?
> I am putting together a quote and this is my first site with this
> strict requirement. Normally I build to the requirement that a site works
> correctly
> on all common browsers and is accessible. Common sense stuff but I know
> that
> the W3C standard can be a bit anal about some things and from my limited
> experience full compliancy doesn't always work correctly in the different
> browsers.
> Would I be better bringing someone on board for a day or two when
> developing
> the code to consult and give pointers on what works, what doesn't and
> work
> arounds?
>
> Any advice welcome.
define W3C compliancy?
accessibility? to A, AA or AAA rating?
or just to meet web standards?
a better clue about what your idea of strict means would help.
I don't think it's a pain at all and cross browser with web standards is
not that hard if you design with it in mind from the start.
happy to help with questions and would happily sell you some time to make
sure everything meets the spec, once we agree what that is ;o)
--
Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
|
 |
|