Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: Best Blog stuff?

date posted 19th January 2006 10:42

On 19 Jan 2006 10:34:39 -0000, Lee Fogarty [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:
>
> If you read the whole document, it is actually left very open to the cour=
ts
> to decide whether you are an employee or not. This is the whole point of
> work for hire.

I am definitely not an employee when I create code for a a client -
otherwise they would have to put me on their payroll.

business to business what I create i own unless expressly agreed otherwise

>
> The term 'employee' doesn't necessarily mean that you are on the company'=
s
> payroll.

where does it say that?

an employee of a company is pretty clearly defined in law.

a freelancer running his own business working for several clients is
clearly not an employee of any of them.

(a contractor working on site for one employer might have different
issues, but the contract will handle that)



>
> It also states that if your work is part of a collective work, then you a=
re
> work for hire. Does this mean that if the customer gives you the content
> for the website, it is a collective work?

quite possibly.

in which case I would specifically contract with the client to clarify
copyright issues.

you originally made a sweeping statement that "More importantly, when
a customer pays you for work, they automatically retain copyright of
your work - unless a specific agreement is reached beforehand. Do you
make your customers aware of every piece of code that
you haven't written?"

I'm arguing that you have that backwards.

the exact opposite applies.

I don't want to get into legal interpretation of all the other
aspects, just to clarify that copyright remains with the creator of
the work unless expressly created as "work for hire" which is
generally agreed to apply to work created for a company by that
companies employees but not in a business to client relationship
unless specifically defined in contract


;o)


--
Join me: http://wiki.workalone.co.uk/
Thank me: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/registry/1VK42TQL7VD2F
Engage me: http://www.boldfish.co.uk/portfolio/



Messages by Day
January 31st 2006
January 30th 2006
January 29th 2006
January 28th 2006
January 27th 2006
January 26th 2006
January 25th 2006
January 24th 2006
January 23rd 2006
January 22nd 2006
January 21st 2006
January 20th 2006
January 19th 2006
January 18th 2006
January 17th 2006
January 16th 2006
January 15th 2006
January 14th 2006
January 13th 2006
January 12th 2006
January 11th 2006
January 10th 2006
January 9th 2006
January 8th 2006
January 7th 2006
January 6th 2006
January 5th 2006
January 4th 2006
January 3rd 2006
January 2nd 2006
January 1st 2006


Messages by Month
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000