Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

Re: FN-FORUM: TCP/IP Properties

date posted 2nd February 2007 12:17

Dominic Marsat wrote:
>>> The 255.255.255.255 subnet mask is valid when specifying the
>>> settings for a PPP adaptor, like an ISDN or ADSL modem.
>>> Usually the Gateway address is identical to the IP Address,
>>> though not in the settings you have presented. Enter the same
>>> information into the Gateway field that you entered into the
>>> IP Address field. The subnet mask is set to
>>> 255.255.255.255 to prevent IP access to other equipment on
>>> the network at the remote end of the connection. Give it a whirl, see
>>> what happens. And Dai, sanity not confirmed just yet we'll wait to
>>> hear back.
>>>
>
> I've had a reply from 1&1 support about the strange settings:
>
> "The subnet mask is correct. In order for servers within our network
> to communicate with each other they need to have that subnet mask."
>
> Andrew do you mean these are normal settings for ADSL? I've checked my ADSL
> setup here and on the ADSL port I have a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255.
> That does make sense.
>
> The machine in question is a webserver - part of a much large network. It's
> a really odd way of setting up a machine like this. I've never seen it
> before.
>
> The problem with the subnet mask is that the only IP my server can ever talk
>
> to is its own (212.227.21.59). The gateway is used to talk to any hosts
> that aren't on the same network. Since the gateway is not in the same
> subnet it shouldn't be able to communicate with it!! I think 1&1 have
> strange and complicated routing going on.
>
>
>
>
Erm, erm. OK, I'm gonna' throw my hands up at this one. 1&1 do appear to
be using an uncommon setup and I haven't seen it used in the way that
you describe. I'd expect to find the 255.255.255.255 subnet mask on PPP
adaptors, not computers connected via ethernet or similar.

Presumably the Web server is hosted in a data centre and you connect
remotely using remote desktop, terminal services, VNC, etc. I suspect
they're using NAT or UPnP equipment. The theory goes that, given a
subnet mask of 255.255.255.255, the Web server should not be able to
connect to other computers. Can you actually ping, traceroute, or browse
the Internet from the machine? I can understand 1&1 attempting to
prevent access to computers on a similar network, if only for security
reasons.

I agree, logically the gateway is on a completely inaccessible network.
Perhaps 1&1 can shed a little more light on this puzzling setup.



Messages by Day
February 28th 2007
February 27th 2007
February 26th 2007
February 25th 2007
February 24th 2007
February 23rd 2007
February 22nd 2007
February 21st 2007
February 20th 2007
February 19th 2007
February 18th 2007
February 17th 2007
February 16th 2007
February 15th 2007
February 14th 2007
February 13th 2007
February 12th 2007
February 11th 2007
February 10th 2007
February 9th 2007
February 8th 2007
February 7th 2007
February 6th 2007
February 5th 2007
February 4th 2007
February 3rd 2007
February 2nd 2007
February 1st 2007


Messages by Month
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000