Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM: Google webmaster tools

date posted 18th October 2007 14:19


not exactly sure what you are saying / suggesting ?


>
> [EMAIL REMOVED] wrote:
>> seeking to obtain traffic through the highly competitive
>> Google bottleneck.
>
> Bit tangential, but this phrase struck a chord with me and suggested a
> possible solution, which may be unfeasible, unattractive to Google an/or
> already discussed extensively, if so forgive me, SEO is not my thing; the
> problem seems to be that only the first x pages on google for a given
> search
> phrase have any value (choose from 1/2 to 5 depending on how much faith
> you
> have in users).
>
> That creates a huge bottleneck when you are saying that worldwide
> competition for that phrase is fighting for those slots. Therefore would
> it
> not make sense to ease the bottleneck by adding a random element to the
> sequence, whether it was a random multiplier applied to the current
> weighting for each result, or some form of banding so that the top 100-200
> results all count as "highly relevant" and then order within that is
> randomised? Clearly algorithm would actualy be morwe complex base don
> number of results, but put that to one side.
>
> Obviously this has potentially to marginally affect overall relevance for
> google users, but given the frequency of spamming anyway that may be less
> significant than the effect it has on sites honestly looking to be
> indexed.
> This way there are at least a decent number of slots to compete for and
> less
> incentive to be #1, more incentive to be in top x.
>
> Without this it seems inevitable that legitimate sites will be drawn to
> the
> dark side - if white hat pratices only get you into the top 100 at present
> this is no real use so you would be tempted to use black hat techniques to
> get into top 10?
>
> Maybe it would just move the goalposts and you would just get black-hat
> competition for the top 100 slots instead of top 10, but...?
>
>
>
> --
> Freelancers, contractors earn more with Prosperity4
> Call 0870 870 4414 or visit www.prosperity4.com
> and benefit from Inland Revenue approved expenses today.
>
> To advertise here: http://www.freelancers.net/advertising.html
>
>



Messages by Day
October 31st 2007
October 30th 2007
October 29th 2007
October 28th 2007
October 27th 2007
October 26th 2007
October 25th 2007
October 24th 2007
October 23rd 2007
October 22nd 2007
October 21st 2007
October 20th 2007
October 19th 2007
October 18th 2007
October 17th 2007
October 16th 2007
October 15th 2007
October 14th 2007
October 13th 2007
October 12th 2007
October 11th 2007
October 10th 2007
October 9th 2007
October 8th 2007
October 7th 2007
October 6th 2007
October 5th 2007
October 4th 2007
October 3rd 2007
October 2nd 2007
October 1st 2007


Messages by Month
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000