Freelancers Network
 
skill list top cap
Homepage
Join the Freelancer's Network
Update your details
Find a freelancer
Post a project
Find a project
Projects Archive
Post a job
Find a job
Jobs Archive
See Dan's Pages
See Andy's Pages
Link to this site
Resources
Join/Leave Forum
Forum Messages
+Additions+ Adverts
Advertising
Contact Us
Subscribe to our newsletter - enter your email address and hit return
Freelancers.net is owned and operated by Andy Stowell and Dan Winchester
skill list end cap
guru web hostcom

Find me again on Freelancers.net

RE: FN-FORUM: Batch process digital photo alterations

date posted 11th November 2007 11:52

Sam wrote:
> I'm working with a digital photo printing site the offers a service to
> "correct" the digital prints for things like underexposure etc to make =
the

> resulting print better. Currently he does this by hand in his software

> Due to the increasing amount of photos he is having to deal with he =
has
> requested for me to find some software that will take a batch of =
images=20
> and sequentially go through each image, showing a side by side =
comparison=20
> with best guess alterations to things like contrast, brightness, =
colour
> saturation etc and allowing a human to decide if it is correct or to =
fine
> tune the automatic fixes in case of mistakes.

> Can anyone recommend anything that will do this sort of thing?


At the risk of giving away trade secrets(!), my partner is a pro digital
photographer and her workflow was revolutionised when she discovered =
Adobe
Bridge, the image management component of Adobe Photoshop CS+.

Where she used to tweak individual images one-by-one, she now =
progressively
tunes whole batches of images in one go - contrast, brightness, =
saturation,
cropping, shadow boost/highlight pulling, sharpening, vignetting, etc. =
You
can copy and paste selected settings from a tuned image to other similar
images, auto tune images in a single click, etc.

The best part is that the workflow is NON-DESTRUCTIVE: no changes are =
made
to the original images, instead they are stored in a "meta-data" XML =
file
alongside the image. When you are happy with the changes (verified via a
thumbnail/filmstrip view), you export the tuned images in any standard
format using a batch process.

Originally, this functionality was limited to RAW (i.e., digital camera =
raw
negative images), but as of CS3, any standard image type can be managed
using the same workflow. RAW is still the best format to work with, as =
it
has a higher dynamic range than general use formats like JPEG, TIFF, =
etc,
but you may not have control over this.=20

If you work with lossy formats like JPEG, then non-destructive workflow =
will
have another benefit. You can tweak a batch of images, then go back and
fine-tune a particular image several times without loss of quality, =
because
the image isn't resaved between each step.

Adobe also have an Adobe Lightroom app, more closely aimed at =
photographers,
but it doesn't seem to offer much RoI if you already have Photoshop (and
therefore Bridge).

Hope that helps .. my partner will kill me if she finds out I've shared
this!

Cheers, Ben

--
Ben Johnson, Neogic Web Solutions
// design . development . managed hosting

w | http://www.neogic.com
t | +44 (0)1242 808 262
e | [EMAIL REMOVED]





Messages by Day
November 30th 2007
November 29th 2007
November 28th 2007
November 27th 2007
November 26th 2007
November 25th 2007
November 24th 2007
November 23rd 2007
November 22nd 2007
November 21st 2007
November 20th 2007
November 19th 2007
November 18th 2007
November 17th 2007
November 16th 2007
November 15th 2007
November 14th 2007
November 13th 2007
November 12th 2007
November 11th 2007
November 10th 2007
November 9th 2007
November 8th 2007
November 7th 2007
November 6th 2007
November 5th 2007
November 4th 2007
November 3rd 2007
November 2nd 2007
November 1st 2007


Messages by Month
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


Messages by Year
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000