|
|
 |
RE: FN-FORUM: Websites for the disabled
date posted 8th January 2008 12:50
> Ok, So surely then what you are saying must apply in reverse if i
understand
> your logic correctly. Therefore if the guy has a physical premises and a
> website he can choose to ignore the law stating his new build premises
must
> be accessible purely on the basis that newly constructed website offers
the
> same products / services.
>
> ????????????????
>>Yes that is correct. The DDA is there to ensure that disabled people can
access services not that they can access >>premises. My local butcher has
premises that would cost a fortune to make accessible. He complies with the
act by >>having a mail order service, this is perfectly acceptible. Its
access to the service that counts not access to the >>mechanism by which the
service is delivered.
Gary!
That truly is a dangerous belief! Please tell me you are being sarcastic
right???????????????????????/
Please.......
No honestly?? You're joking aren't you?
Phew! I knew you were.
|
 |
|