Re: FN-FORUM: Websites for the disabled

date posted 8th January 2008 13:02

-------- Original Message --------=0D=0A=0D=0A> I would never advise a clie=
nt that they don't need accessibility, nor =0D=0A> would i seek to bully a=
client to have accessibility *added* as it's =0D=0A> my ethos that all si=
tes I build should strive for non-exclusion. [1]=0D=0A> =0D=0A> ;o)=0D=0A> =
=0D=0A> [1] non-exclusion means not doing something knowingly that would =
=0D=0A> prevent someone with a disability from accessing the content - it's=
=0D=0A> not the same as accessibility, which strives for inclusion of all=
=0D=0A> possible users and extends to providing written transcripts of vi=
deo =0D=0A> content etc...=0D=0A=0D=0AThem's wise words them are.=0D=0A=0D=
=0A-- =0D=0ACheers,=0D=0AGary=0D=0Ahttp://www.garyshort.org=0D=0A=0D=0A